Celery Fields Sell Out, Part II: The Designer Ordinance

Advocates for Sarasota’s celebrated birding and recreation park, the Celery Fields, gained a victory in June when the Planning Commission recommended the County deny James Gabbert’s petition to build an industrial waste recycling facility on Celery Fields’ lands. Good news, but until the County Commission votes against this project, the Celery Fields remains threatened.

Last year, Sarasota County put the 11- and 7-acre public lands at the southwest and northwest corners of Apex Road and Palmer Boulevard up for sale by issuing Invitations to Negotiate (ITN). The County sale offer resulted in just one bidder proposing an incompatible use for each parcel of land: County official James Gabbert’s TST Ventures, with an industrial waste project, and the now departed Restaurant Depot, purveyor of wholesale restaurant supplies. Restaurant Depot flew the coop when the firm understood the ferocity of public opposition to their project. Mr. Gabbert’s industrial waste facility proposal comes before the Board of County Commissioners on Aug. 23. While the Planning Commission’s recommendation to deny the project is positive, the County Commission will decide the fate of this ill-wrought industrial proposal. Testimony during the Planning Commission meeting shined a light on prolific political donor Gabbert’s inside track.

In the fifth hour of the June 1 public hearing, City of Sarasota Director of Neighborhood and Development Services Tim Litchet came to the podium to give public input on the proposed industrial recycling facility. Seeing a City official give public input to the County against a development project is rare. I’ve never seen it happen.

Mr. Litchet explained his position and credentials, and thanked the Planning Commissioners for their service. He said he had reviewed County staff’s report, which was well prepared and pointed out “weak areas and potential pitfalls” with the proposal. First, he noted it was interesting that the County chose to dispose of the property by issuing an Invitation to Negotiate (ITN) rather than a Request for Proposal (RFP). Mr. Litchet explained that an RFP would have solicited the highest bid for the property, while an ITN allows the County more flexibility to get both “the use and the person they want.”

It has been widely reported that Mr. Gabbert’s businesses donated over $17,000 to the campaigns of four of five sitting County Commissioners, along with $10,000 to a local Political Action Committee (PAC).

Mr. Litchet then observed that it appears the County wants to make the site a dump or recycling center because the applicant (Gabbert) was “apparently instrumental in drafting the changes to relevant zoning section 5.3.5.b.2.b, as reflected in ordinance 2016-08… that was a new designer ordinance which really only applies to this site which reduces the dump recycling center acreage from 35 acres to 15, and it appears to allow the dump recycling center to not necessarily be in an enclosed building.” Litchet then relayed how the designer ordinance specifically reducing the industrial recycling land requirement from 35 acres to 15 acres for Mr. Gabbert’s project was approved on Dec. 14, a full month after Gabbert submitted his Nov. 13 dump recycling center petition. “How do you file a petition utilizing new zoning code language that has not even been approved? he asked. “I don’t think you can legally do that”.


Keen observers may have noted that the parcel the County has put up for sale is 11 acres (10.74 acres, to be exact). The designer ordinance requires 15 acres for the proposed recycling dump. What about the missing 4 acres? Take a look:

In the photo above, the public’s land, 10.74 acres at the SW corner of Apex and Palmer, is numbered “1”.

Mr. Gabbert’s company, TST Ventures, owns 4 acres west of the public’s land (number 2 in the photo). TST Ventures also owns the long, skinny 1.62 acre land parcel south of both the public’s 11 acres and TST Ventures’ 4 acres. The 1.62 acre land parcel is number 3 in the photo.

TST Ventures purchased the 4 acres west of the County’s property in April 2015 from Commercial Refrigerator Door Company, Inc., one year before the County put the SW corner of Apex and Palmer up for sale via an ITN (Invitation to Negotiate). Gabbert-owned TST Ventures paid $100,000 for those 4 acres; the 2015 assessed value was $361,700. The purchase price was $261,700 below assessed value. Market value is typically higher than assessed value.

Looking back a few years further, Mr. Gabbert attempted to site an industrial waste transfer facility less than a mile from the current proposal. In 2014, Mr. Gabbert had proposed an industrial waste transfer facility at 700 Cattlemen Rd (east of I75, where the north end of Packinghouse Rd meets Cattlemen). Gabbert LLC purchased that 7 acre property in 2013 for $625K. Gabbert’s 2014 TST Ventures industrial waste transfer facility proposal didn’t come to fruition. He sold the 700 Cattlemen Rd. property in June 2015 for 1.8 million, two months after buying the 4 acres at 6150 Palmer Blvd for 100K.


Many people profit through real estate & vacant land investments, and flipping land. With County land and real estate transactions, a free market is operating when the County serves the public interest. Mr. Gabbert is a County official, an elected member of the County Charter Review Board. He is benefiting from a “designer ordinance” for his proposed recycling dump, and he was able to negotiate a purchase price on adjacent land that was a fraction of it’s assessed value. While the Planning Commission recommended denial of the recycling dump, the public must not assume this proposal is dead. It is up to the County Commission to deny the dump proposal on August 23rd.

While other industrial waste facilities must be on 35 acres, Mr. Gabbert has been successful in getting a special law passed reducing that requirement to 15 acres solely for his project, with no guarantee that the facility be enclosed. Given the applicant’s success at gaming the system, let’s recognize that public outcry is the only thing that has stopped this train wreck. An industrial land use near a premier ecotourism wildlife habitat would be a spectacular betrayal of community planning, interest and investment. The Sarasota Board of County Commissioners can embrace our community vision and chart a different course. If the public wants to drive a stake in the heart of this polluting blight, we must show up and call for denial at the August 23rd County Commission meeting.

The Board of County Commissioners will meet at
1660 Ringling Blvd., 1rst floor Chambers
9 am
The sole agenda item is the proposed Industrial Waste Transfer Facility at Apex Rd. and Palmer Blvd.

Please share this information with others! Like this content? Get “The Detail” in your inbox by clicking on the follow button and providing your e-mail.

If you can’t attend on August 23rd, please e-mail the County Commission at commissioners@scgov.net and urge them to deny this proposal.

3 Comments on Celery Fields Sell Out, Part II: The Designer Ordinance

  1. We will have our day on August 23. The BOCC should not grant Mr. Gabbert his requests for developing his dump, nor should they sell the county lands if they listen to the people and respect the county’s Comprehensive Plan.

    However, since the BOCC (under the old Christine Robinson regime) were more than happy to grant Gabbert his waste station on property adjacent to the Celery Fields, without taking into account the horrific traffic problems that will occur with the influx of truck traffic, the reality is, our elected officials have effectively doomed the “Palmerians” who live in neighborhoods near the Celery Fields.

    Mr. Gabbert has made it abundantly clear that if he does not get his requests satisfied for the special exception and rezone, he will still develop his waste transfer station. Couple that traffic with whatever Benderson has up his sleeve for the property adjacent to the Celery Fields that the County stupidly sold, it’s a depressing prospect for all who are opposed to these awful giveaways to developers. When does it end?

    It ends on August 23. We are going to win this and if we don’t, we will file an appeal. The buck has to stop somewhere and entitlements of corporate welfare are becoming less and less popular with the Sarasota public.

  2. I would like to thank Cathy and The Detail for providing eye opening journalism – with facts and information, that truly open our eyes to what is going on. I know, first hand, the commission will ignore you and follow there own agenda – In short, you can only stop them with a lawsuit. Nothing else matters. I am not suggesting you spend thousands in legal fees, but without an impartial judge, you do not have a chance to sway the commission. I learned this too late, and the commission allowed the building of homes on a toxic dump. How can they do that you may ask? Well they simply did not test for the previously located toxins underground.
    Get it ??? Read my sight closely, listen to the testimony, then ask How Is This Possible. Foxfirewest.com
    ( The Detail Explains it well).


  3. Thank you for bringing the facts to light. Now it’s up to us, the local voters, as well anyone interested in preserving the environmental treasure we have in the Celery Fields.

Leave a Reply


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers:

%d bloggers like this: